Monday, July 26, 2010

Rebecca Hobbs - Absurd and Imperialism

This week the lecture was given by Rebecca at her Gallery show - Failing, Falling, Flying.
It is fascinating to see the practicing side of a lecturer that had taught me before, and learn what aspects of life inspired them to make their own art. Especially when i am most inexperienced the field of photography/media.

Upon entering the show, i saw the footage of Ah-round first. I did not understood the hidden meanings in the work, but i liked the skillfully used camera techniques, and wondered if it would be used to enforce the idea behind the work. After Ah-round, i moved on seeing the works displayed at Failing, falling, flying.
One element i really enjoyed was the interesting titles of each work. The choice of names are short and clever as it suggests alot of movement, which is effective as most of the photos are action shots.
Rebecca then went over telling us about her years of practice, which answered alot of questions in my head when i first viewed her art. Many of the works are made overseas during her studies in L.A. The work i like the best out of all is a short filmed footage - Tumbleweeds, 2004
http://www.videoartchive.org.au/rhobbs/weeds.html

Rebecca told us that this was shot at Pioneer Town in L.A. I was alittle confused and frightened at first, people rolling on ground out of no where in an empty town is a scary image that reminds me of alot of scary movies (like spider walk on the stairs). However after awhile i start to find it quite humorous and silly.

Humor is a very important element in Rebecca's work, and one of the main influences in her practice. Her works are largely based on the ideas of 'Absurd' and 'Imperialism', and i choose to talk about the 'Absurd'.
Rebecca states that Absurd to her holds the idea of 'Strife to find meaning in the world, but never been able to find it.' She was inspired of this idea from Sisyphus, who was punished by god to forever be pushing a huge boulder up a hill, the rock then will roll back down; therefore repeating the process for eternity. Rebecca combined this idea of the ambition to find meaning with humor. She said that alot of her earlier works are commonly played upon dirty jokes, because there's so very little meaning that they hold, and that is why the names of her works are rather raw and literal.
I find the way Rebecca explain her perception on 'Absurd' interesting. She talked about the absurdity in relation to Irony and Slap-stick, and the three are closely linked and the difference is fine lined, which is written in the essay by Peter Shand - I'm walking backwards for Christmas. In the essay Shane also made a reference to the 'myth of Sisyphus' in relation to the idea of absurdity. My favourite quote of this essay was 'Absurd actions take on an independent existence that have nothing to do with their goals.' - this perfectly describe the waste of endless effort of trying to find an answer in life. The essay also mentions one of Rebecca's favourite artists: Bas Jan Ader, and his work of him riding on a bicycle into a canal, in which is another example of the Slap-stick humor.

















Another artist that Rebecca was greatly impacted by was Roman Singer.
Singer is a Switzerland artist that does mostly photography and videos.

The frozen in time action 'slap-stick' shots is indeed very similar to alot of Rebecca's works, and after seeing the works by Singer, especially this one with the car leaping into the air, i begin to come to better understanding of the question that Rebecca talked about: 'when is the meaning created?' I start to wonder the same if the meaning was actually created long before the vehicle was started? Or was it when the car started running? Or maybe it's when the car ran off the road? It is indeed a meaning that no one would be ever to find no matter how hard you try.
http://www.romansigner.ch/en/start/

I was never good at photography, nor do i think i would ever be good at it. It is not something i am particularly interested in. However Rebecca's talk about 'Absurd' have given me new ways of looking at meanings in art as well as our world in general. Her way of looking at the means of life is very new to me and also inspiring. I would like to make works that creates a question that maybe no one can have the answer of. Though sadly i don't think it would be photography.

After Rebecca's talk we were to go to the Auckland art gallery and pick our own winner. To be honest, i did not understand at all what the works are about, as i could not relate the title to the work. This made it very difficult for me to choose, however i found the work 'Something Transparent' (please go round the back) by Fiona Connor quite interesting. I like the structure of the work, as it looked rather architectural. The title of the work was also quite witty, as i realised after viewing the work i can see the installation from the front and back. Connor's work was the only the one that i thought was quite creative.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Mary Curtis - Objects

Blog Qustion: Explore the relationship between function and decoration in the works of Mary Curtis with relation to her process, and the presentation in exhibition: Meta - decorative.


--
This week we are looking at objects with our lecturer Mary Curtis, who is also a well known contemporary New Zealand jeweller. I am personally not very familiar working with 3D objects, so Mary's talk was very interesting for me.


Every artist gather inspirations to work into their art, and Mary is a collector herself. She collects everything that holds interest to her, mostly everyday household objects. Sometimes it could be things that most of us would consider as rubbish, she would see the beauty and potential in it's form to become a piece of jewellery.

Like this champagne bottle cage she found at a wedding is now a pendant.














I really liked the slide of the collection called 'An inordinate fondness of beetles'





This is a collection display at Oxford University Museum of Natural History.



The sight of a beetle usually make me cringe, however this display brings out the beauty in the insects, the colors and the shine of their bodies is almost jewel like. The shine illuminates each individual beetle, as in Mary's words 'the light on the objects bounces off eachother...'

This made me realise that although building a collection does not require any construction of skills, is the most important part of making art, as it is the source of inspiration. Collecting lets you see things in a different way which brings out the visual elements of the object, that you may have never realised before.

Mary then moved on talking about Function vs Decoration in terms of objects, which is the central

In the slide picture of the painting of Queen Elizabeth I which is all about the notion of display. The intense style decorative fashion in the era of the painting restrains comfortable physical movement, therefore it's not practicle, but it is a display of beauty and wealth.

This concept inspired Mary with her works greatly. Many of Mary's works are made from everyday consumables, however turning them into jewels. I really like the use of materials in her jewelleries shown at Meta-Decoration. The print of the wallpapers are very victorian styled. At the same time wallpapers holds the connotation of being a form of decoration, Mary use it to decorate one's body. However unlike the traditional way of decorating the body, where only the rich can afford, Mary's jewelleries are made of inexpenssive modern house-hold materials.





My favourite piece of work from Meta-Decoration is the Green Blanket necklace.

She showed us photos she took of the forever changing workspace of hers while she stayed at Munich.
It is very interesting to see the photos because it shows a process of thinking and trials, the blanket pieces are constantly being moved around and repositioned.
For Mary this is the equivilant of concept drawing.
It is very important because this is the step where she had to deal the function side of the decoration. During which, she had to figure out how would this piece be worn on a body, how the body will be changed by this piece of decoration.
I am personally not familiar with Jewellery making, so it is very intriquing for me to see this experimental thinking stages that deal with function physically.
While looking at Mary's design style of the Green blanket necklace reminds me one of my favourite jewellery designer Tina Tarnoff.



Tarnoff is well known for her use of printed paperart in her jewelleries.










When we went to Meta-Decoration, i understood why Mary was very stressed over how things are displayed. Every piece of Mary's works were displayed in a glass case, hanging from very thin hanging structures. I think it was very effective because the works are positioned up-right at eye-level height, as i stand infront of the works i can picture how it would look on a body.
I found Mary's talk very helpful. Working with 3D objects is not my strong area, however I am very keen on learning jewellery making. From this lecture i am interested in trying new ways of constructing ideas to make art, i like the idea of making a 3D 'drawing'.